I was talking to Marla Durben Hirsch the other day, and she
mentioned a warning issued by the California Medical Association to California
physicians about a Network Access Agreement.
Apparently this national network is recontracting, so this is an issue
that physicians in other states might want to watch.
Continue reading "What is a Network Access Agreement?" »
Two Georgia physicians sued Private Health Care Systems, a PPO provider
network, claiming that PHCS injured them by inappropriately sharing their names
and practice information with a company selling medical discount cards to the
uninsured (“Capella”). The physicians
claimed that their agreements with PHCS limited their participation to those PHCS
plans or products whose members had insurance and PHCS misappropriated their
identities for commercial gain when it made their names available to Capella
for use by Capella card holders.
Continue reading "Potential Remedy for Silent PPO Activity? Court Allows Damages to Georgia Physicians whose Discount Inappropriately Used" »
As I’ve said in previous posts, providers should consider giving
their best rates only to those payors and products that yield the highest
return – defined as some combination of paying high rates and imposing few administrative hassles. See previous post: Here.
This is certainly true when the payor is offering – or may
begin to offer – high deductible health plans. I’ve been reading lately about payors
offering Real Time Claim Adjudication (“RTCA”) as a way to allow accurate collection of a patient's deductible at the time of service. See earlier post about Aetna.
Humana recently touted their RTCA system
as saving their “pilot practice” $14,000 per year in billing costs.
Continue reading "Some Considerations when a Payor Offers “Real Time Claim Adjudication”" »
An “Integration clause” in a contract between an insurer and
a health care provider has nothing to do with school busing.
Continue reading "What is an Integration Clause and why is it important?" »
The dispute resolution provisions in a
contract are often skipped over during negotiations, either because the parties
negotiating the contract don’t understand them or because the managed care
company actively discourages changes to these provisions because they will
require the dreaded review by “legal.”
It is worthwhile to review the dispute
resolution provisions in detail and to make sure your staff understands them
and follows them. If problems arise in your relationship with the managed care
company, a thorough set of dispute resolution provisions can make the
difference between a quick resolution or a protracted, expensive process that
leaves the provider feeling ill used.
Continue reading "Getting to Know the Dispute Resolution Provisions in your Payor Contracts" »
A recent post by Reed Tinsley, a Texas-based CPA, warns
about a letter one of his clients received from UnitedHealthcare (“UH”). He quotes the letter as saying "...we
are making changes in the way we direct claims payments for services rendered
by non-network care providers and facilities. ....UH will pay commercial
members directly for services upon receipt of the claim".
The post does not reveal whether these changes are limited
to a specific region or benefit plan, including a specific self – insured plan
that UHC is administering. It’s likely
that the letter from UH doesn’t contain those details, either. This practice is called “refusing assignment”.
Continue reading "UnitedHealthCare Refusing to Accept Patient Assignment-of-Benefits? " »
Perhaps the most important part of
any contract is its definitions section. This is the first place to look to get a glimpse of the payer’s
contracting strategy. Perhaps for this
reason, some payers have tucked that section into the back of an agreement or
made it an attachment. When reviewing
definitions, consider these suggestions:
Continue reading "Begin at the Beginning - A few words about definitions" »
Although issues arising with your contracted Payors are
frustrating, many payment battles occur when you provide care to a patient who
is covered by a payor with whom you don’t
have a contract. Here are some of
the common issues and some possible solutions for your consideration.
Continue reading "Dealing with Payors when you are Non Participating" »
A "Silent PPO" is an arrangement where one
organization buys or uses a discounted rate for services from a health provider
or practitioner without the provider’s knowing authorization. The provider signs a contract giving a
discount to certain payors and suddenly additional payors, who were not
intended recipients of the discount, are discounting their payments.
Continue reading "What is a “Silent PPO” and why do you care?" »
I just had an interesting conversation with the Director of
Revenue Management for a specialty care hospital. He told me of a mission he’s on to develop
direct relationships with area employers. Unlike many providers who view their relationship with insurers as a
primary relationship and only through
them have any relationship with employers, he looks for opportunities to
meet with local business owners. He
feels these are his primary relationship and he would prefer to get to know
them without insurers present. He believes
this reinforces his view that his hospital and the employers have shared interests-
in providing quality care at an affordable price. Insurers are only middlemen and their
interests do not necessarily match.
Continue reading "Using Employers as a Resource" »